What’s New?
Housing Program
Information:
  Public Housing
  Section 8
     Section 8 Homeownership
  HUD Rental Housing
  Housing Preservation
  Fair Housing
  Rural Housing
    Service
Publications
Congress and Housing
About NHLP
Opportunities at NHLP
Housing Justice Network (HJN)
Thank You
Links
Search

 

Disclaimer

National Housing Law Project
Housing Preservation

 

Opt-Outs - Owner Nonrenewal of Expiring Project-Based Section 8 Contracts

Description:

An owner must give a one year notice in order to "opt-out" of the project-based Section 8 contract. Owners who fail to give proper notice upon contract expiration may either renew the contract for up to one year, or permit tenants to remain at the same tenant share of rent until one year after proper notice is served. Where project-based assistance is not renewed, most tenants will receive enhanced vouchers, which may not be sufficient to enable them to remain in their homes. For more information see HUD Housing Programs: Tenants’ Rights and 1998 Supplement, Sec. 15.4.3.

Statutes

42 U.S.C. 1437f(c)(8) (as amended Oct. 20, 1999) (requires one year advance notice to tenants and HUD for termination of project-based Section 8 contract, and prescribes form of notice).

Multifamily Assisted Housing Reform and Affordability Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-65, Title V, 111 Stat. 1343, 1384 (Oct. 27, 1997), codified at 42 U.S.C.A. § 1437f (Historical and Statutory Notes, "Multifamily Housing Assistance"), as amended by Pub. L. No. 106-74, §531 (Oct. 20, 1999), (MAHRAA) (Sec. 524 covers Section 8 contract renewals, statute outlines Mark to Market restructuring). MAHRAA is not codified in typical fashion, but is included as a "note" to 42 U.S.C. § 1437f, so legal reporting services have not compiled an amended version of the legislation. The document linked above is NHLP’s compilation of the statute with amendments.

Pub. L. No. 106-74, §531, 113 Stat. 1113 (Oct. 20, 1999) (MAHRAA §524(d), as amended, requiring enhanced vouchers for all Section 8 contracts that are not renewed).

 

Older and other statutes for opt-outs:

Pub. L. No. 104-120, § 2(b), 110 Stat. 834 (1996) (renewal of Section 8 contracts).

Pub. L. No. 104-134, § 101(e), Title II, paragraph entitled "Annual Contributions for Assisted Housing," 110 Stat. 1321, 1321-265 (Apr. 26, 1996) (providing for enhanced vouchers and setting their rent levels).

Pub. L. No. 104-204, 110 Stat. 2874, 2883 (Sept. 26, 1996) (appropriation for renewing Section 8 contracts).

Pub. L. No. 105-276, §549, 112 Stat. 2461 (Oct. 21, 1998) (restoring the requirement that owners provide one-year’s notice of expiration or termination commencing Oct. 21, 1998).

Pub. L. No. 106-74, §535, 113 Stat. 1121 (Oct. 20, 1999) (removing requirement that notice state reasons for notices served after effective date).

Pub. L. No. 106-377, 114 Stat. 1441, 1441A-11 (Oct. 27, 2000) (appropriations for renewing Section 8 contracts and enhanced vouchers).

Regulations

24 C.F.R. Part 401 (2001) (Multifamily Housing Mortgage and Housing Assistance Restructuring Program (Mark-to-Market).

24 C.F.R. Part 402 (2001) (Project-based Section 8 Contract Renewal Without Restructuring (Under Section 524(a) of MAHRAA)).

Notices and Other Administrative Issuances:

HUD, Section 8 Renewal Policy Guide (Jan. 19, 2001) [Link to document posted in Prepayment outline]. The document posted here is a version of the Guide as amended through November 2001. Check HUD's web site for any revisions. This guide explicitly supercedes notices H 99-36 and H 98-34, below, which are now relevant for past opt-outs. Chapter 8 of the Guide covers opt-outs and Chapter 11 covers "Resident Issues" including notice requirements. Appendices 11-1 and 11-2 prescribe the required form the notice, which includes a certification that the owner will accept enhanced vouchers.

HUD Notice H 99-36, "Project-Based Section 8 Contracts Expiring in Fiscal Year 2000" (Dec. 29, 1999)

HUD Notice H 98-34, "Project-Based Section 8 Contracts Expiring in Fiscal Year 1999" (Oct. 16, 1998).

* HUD Notices may also be accessed through www.hudclips.org/sub_nonhud/cgi/hudclips.cgi.

Data

Data on Section 8 Opt-Outs and Terminations to date can be found on the National Housing Trust’s Web-site at www.nhtinc.org .

HUD data on Section 8 projects (except Mod Rehabs) compiled from its various information systems is available on-line at: www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/mfh/exp/mfhdiscl.cfm.

 

Websites:

National Housing Trust - www.nhtinc.org 

National Low-Income Housing Coalition Website - www.nlihc.org 

HUD’s Office of Multifamily Housing Assistance Restructuring (OMHAR) - www.hud.gov/omhar  - has some data on project filings, rules and guidelines, PAEs, and other helpful information

HUDClips - www.hudclips.org/sub_nonhud/cgi/hudclips.cgi . Website has the applicable statutes, regs, Notices, and guidelines

Other Resources

Also posted to this web site is a Guide to Challenging Conversions of Federally Assisted Housing in California, much of which is applicable to housing conversions anywhere in the country. Includes a Check List for advocates’ use when evaluating adequacy of an owner’s notice.

State and Local Initiatives

The following state statutes and local codes include provisions providing protections in opt-out situations.

Cal. Gov't. Code § 65863.10 and § 65863.11 (notice and right of first refusal for opt-out or prepayment)

Cal. Gov't. Code § 65580-65589.8 (land use planning law containing some features that encourage preservation)

310 Ill. Comp. Stat. § 60/3 (notice and right of first refusal for sale or disposition of properties with HUD-subsidized mortgages)

20 Ill. Comp. Stat. § 3805/8.1 (prepayment of certain state-financed loans)

Maine Revised Statutes Annotated Title 30-A, § 4972 and § 4973 (notice and right of first refusal for termination of affordability restrictions)

Minn. Stat. § 504B.255 (notice required for opt-out or prepayment)

Md. Ann. Code of 1957, Art. 83B, § 9-101, et seq. (notice and right of first refusal for sale or disposition of HUD-subsidized housing)

Rhode Island Gen. Laws § 34-45-4 et seq. (notice and right of first refusal for sale, conversion, or prepayment)

Texas Govt. Code Annotated § 2306.185(f), et seq. (notice required for sale, prepayment or opt-out, directs housing department to prioritize funding for preservation)

Wash. Rev. Code Ch. 59.28 (notice required for contract termination or prepayment)

Denver Mun. Code §12-106, et seq. (opt-out or sale of HUD-subsidized property, Section 8 contracts)

D.C. Code §§ 42-2851.01 et seq., 47-864 et seq. (2002) (termination of HUD-subsidized housing, right of first refusal, tax incentive for renewal) (Title II of the attached document).

Portland City Code § 30.01.030, et seq. (opt-out or sale of HUD-subsidized property, Section 8 contracts)

San Francisco Admin. Code § 60.4, et seq. (intended sale or disposition of properties with Section 8 contracts)

Further information on these and other laws can be found at the State and Local Initiatives  portion of this outline.

Cases

183rd St./187th St. Tenants' Association v. Cuomo, No. 00-4174 (S.D. Fla., filed Oct. 2000) Challenge to opt-out based on the one year notice requirement in 42 USC § 1437f(c)(8) (1998) and fair housing grounds including violation of the fair housing act, and HUD's duty to affirmatively further fair housing pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 3608.

215 Alliance v. Cuomo, 61 F.Supp. 2d 879, No. 98-64 DWF/AJB (D. Minn. Aug. 30, 1999). Successful challenge to HUD's approval of opt-out using HUD form notice due to lack of clarity regarding owners intent and failure to state reasons (the latter required by the version of 42 USC §1437f(c)(9) then in effect, since repealed); HUD's enhanced voucher policy of not subsidizing subsequent rent increases contrary to authorizing law; favorable dicta on Fair Housing claims 42 U.S.C. §§ 3604 and 3608, failure to consider the effects on racial minorities, disabled individuals, and failure to affirmatively further fair housing.

East Village (Dist. Colo., unfiled) Section 8 opt-out, draft claims v. HUD and owner, including Fair Housing Act and failure to give notice including the reason for the nonrenewal to tenants and to HUD, pursuant to former 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(c)(8); City acquired property (pending negotiations) through condemnation and negotiated sale; fate of project-based Section 8 contract pending negotiations with City (PHA is new owner) and HUD.

Green v. Sunpointe Assocs., Ltd., No. C96-1542C, 1997 WL 1526484 (W.D. Wa. Order granting summary judgment May 12, 1997) Owner’s decision to terminate participation in Section 8 tenant-based subsidy program for all tenants held contrary to Fair Housing Act on disparate impact theory; project had regulatory agreement accompanying state financing.

Hines v. Charleston Hous. Auth., No. 1:01CV00070 CDP (E.D. Mo. filed April, 2001) Individual tenants and housing advocacy organization challenge prepayment of 515 FmHA financing and proposed termination of Section 8 contract and demolition. Claims include violation of Rural Rental Homes statutes, violation of Section 515 loan resolution, note and deed of trust, improper notice of Section 8 HAP contract termination, and fair housing discrimination and affirmatively furthering claims. Preliminary Injunction motion pending.

Kenneth Arms Tenants’ Association v. Martinez, No. 01 CV 832 LKK JFM (E.D.Ca. filed May 2, 2001) Court preliminarily enjoined a proposed prepayment of 236 BMIR mortgages and termination of Section 8 project-based contract. The decision was based primarily on violation of state law, Cal. Gov't Code Secs. 65863.10 and 65863.11. The court found no federal preemption of state statute, determined HUD has no duty to enforce state law, and dismissed HUD.

People to End Homelessness v. Martinez , (D. R.I., March 29, 2001) (Order on Motion to Dismiss) (Develco) Plaintiffs challenge HUD's approval of Section 8 opt out under Administrative Procedures Act based on notices that do not comply with state and federal statutes, and failure to affirmatively further fair housing under 42 U.S.C. § 3608(e). The District Court dismissed all claims against HUD, and partially dismissed claims against the Owner.

Young v. United States Dep’t of HUD, No. C-85-4642-EFL (N.D. Ca. Prelim. inj. denied Sept. 1985), injunction pending appeal denied, No. 85-2584 (9th Cir. 1985) (Clearinghouse No. 39,655) Unsuccessful challenge to Section 8 opt-out in 1985 as Fair Housing Act violation using disparate impact theory.

 

Articles

"HUD Multifamily Inventory Awaits Decisions," 27 HOUSING LAW BULLETIN 139 (Sept. 1997).

"The New Section 8 Renewal and Restructuring Program: An In-Depth Review," 27 HOUSING LAW BULLETIN 175 (Nov. 1997) (long summary).

"Moving Forward on Project-Based Section 8 Expiring Contracts," 27 HOUSING LAW BULLETIN 195 (Dec. 1997) (next steps).

"What Might Happen to Section 8 Properties Under the New Law?", 28 HOUSING LAW BULLETIN 17 (Feb. 1998) (how to begin categorizing properties).

"Section 8 Renewal and Restructuring: Working At the State Level", 28 HOUSING LAW BULLETIN 35 (Mar. 1998) (commencing state and local activities).

"Why Does the Section 8 Budget Estimate Keep Changing?", 28 HOUSING LAW BULLETIN 80 (May 1998).

"IRS Issues Favorable "Mark to Market" Revenue Ruling", 28 HOUSING LAW BULLETIN 134 (Aug. 1998).

"HUD Issues Regulations for Section 8 "Mark to Market" Program", 28 HOUSING LAW BULLETIN 143 (Sept. 1998).

"Important New Laws for HUD Multifamily Housing", 28 HOUSING LAW BULLETIN 191(Oct./Nov. 1998) (reviews relevant provisions of FY ‘99 HUD Appropriations Act).

"HUD’s Fair Housing Duties and the Loss of Public and Assisted Housing", 29 HOUSING LAW BULLETIN 1 (Jan. 1999).

"Preservation Crisis Mounts: HUD and Congress Respond" 29 HOUSING LAW BULLETIN 67 (April 1999).

"HUD Finally Announces "Mark-Up" Policy to Prevent Some Section 8 Opt-Outs", 29 HOUSING LAW BULLETIN 96 (May 1999).

"HUD’s Final "Mark-Up" Notice Contains Important Changes", 29 HOUS. L. BULL. 138 (July/Aug. 1999) (reviewing the final HUD "Mark Up" policy Notice H 99-15).

"Minnesota Section 8 Tenants Win Major Preservation Victory", 29 HOUS. L. BULL. 161 (Sept. 1999) (reviewing 215 Alliance v. Cuomo).

"Preserving Federally Assisted Housing at the State and Local level: A Legislative Tool Kit," 29 HOUS. L. BULL. 183 (Oct. 1999) (survey of state and local preservation initiatives).

"Final Mark to Market Regulations," 30 HOUS. L. BULL. 61 (May 2000).

"New Studies Assessing Risk of Opt-outs Enable Advocates to Target Preservation Efforts," 30 HOUS. L. BULL. 82 (June 2000).

"HUD Issues Final Rule on Tenant Organizing," 30 HOUS. L. BULL. 113 (Aug. 2000).

"Congress Clarifies Tenants’ Right to Remain in HUD Multifamily Conversions," 30 HOUS. L. BULL. 138 (Sept. 2000).

"HUD Issues New Section 8 Renewal Policy Guide," 31 HOUS. L. BULL. 61 (March 2001).

"Second HUD Report on "Vouchered-Out" Assisted Properties," 31 HOUS. L. BULL. 68 (March 2001).

"HUD Data on Section 8 Projects," 31 HOUS. L. BULL. 116 (May 2001).

"Opt-out and Prepayment of Four Section 8 Properties Preliminarily Enjoined," 31 HOUS. L. BULL. 180 (July/Aug.2001).

"HUD Revises Enhanced Voucher Guidance," 32 HOUS. L. BULL. 8 (Jan. 2002).

 

 

 
Main Office:
National Housing Law Project
614 Grand Ave., Ste. 320
Oakland, CA 94610
510-251-9400
Fax 510-451-2300
nhlp@nhlp.org
Washington, DC Office:
1012 Fourteenth Street NW, Suite 610
Washington, D.C. 20005
(202) 347-8775 (202) 347-8776 (FAX)
Page Copyright © 1999-2002  NHLP
Site designed, maintained,