| |
National Housing Law
Project
Housing
Law Bulletin |
|
HUD Offers PHAs Guidance on Welfare Reform
Early and aggressive participation in the 50-plus state planning
processes that will shape welfare reform is the predominant message in
recent advice offered by HUD to the 3,400 public housing authorities (PHAs)
nationwide. In an October 22, 1996, letter,1
HUD offers guidance on welfare reform following enactment of the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act.2
The letter sets out the principal known ramifications of welfare reform
and includes a primer on immediate steps PHAs can take to smooth the transition
to the revised welfare system for residents and attempt to somewhat mitigate
its adverse impacts on PHA operations. The letter contains several helpful
attachments: (1) a HUD-prepared impact analysis; (2) a Department of Health
and Human Services description of the principal provisions of the new welfare
law; (3) a description of the law’s impact on legal immigrants; (4) a state-by-state
breakdown comparing the new Temporary Assistance of Needy Families (TANF)
block grant with AFDC; (5) a description of the President’s proposed jobs
program;3 and (6) a summary of HUD’s existing
employment and training programs.4
In advancing the idea of early response by PHAs to
welfare reform, the Secretary identifies three likely pri-
mary impacts:
• First, very low-income persons cannot look to government to furnish
a minimum income guarantee. The letter catalogs income reductions that
current welfare recipients can anticipate that will affect their ability
to pay rent. Eligibility for benefits will be reduced to five years over
a lifetime with a requirement that families begin work after two years.
In addition, legal immigrants will lose eligibility for Supplemental Security
Income (SSI) and food stamps next year, and SSI benefits for many children
will end.
• Second, welfare assistance which in the past took the form of a minimum
income guarantee will be refocused on equipping families to work.
• Third, welfare policy, including the scope of eligibility, benefit
level and overall design, will be vested with the states. State prerogative
could result in even harsher time limits than the federal five-year guarantee/two-year
work requirement.
HUD promises cooperation with housing authorities making the transition
to the new system, but since the critical policy decisions are to be made
at the state level, it offers suggestions for actions that each PHA can
take right away to minimize the potential adverse impacts for residents.
PHAs are urged (1) to learn about the new law and its specific effect
on the individual PHA and its residents, including the content and focus
of the PHA’s state plan; (2) actively and aggressively inform state policymakers
of the impact of their actions on residents, including the tie between
benefits and rents and service and training opportunities needed by residents
(PHAs are urged to participate in the local planning process for the Welfare-to-Work
jobs program); (3) change PHA policy, including admission preferences,
to reward work and examine how, in concert with nonprofits and resident
groups, to use PHA facilities for delivery of needed self-sufficiency services
and access HUD-sponsored employment programs; (4) build on partnerships
with the host of public and private organizations, businesses and schools
whose resources will be needed to assist residents moving from dependence
to self-sufficiency; (5) involve residents and resident organizations in
planning for changes, particularly the new benefit time limits, and taking
actions that will address their needs for supportive services, including
training and job placement; (6) become more aggressive about creating employment
opportunities for residents, including through CDBG and Section 3 obligations;
(7) provide information to a HUD-sponsored clearinghouse that will document
experiences and which approaches are working and why.
In addition to reminding housing authorities of the potential for resident
loss of income, HUD highlights changes made by the Personal Responsibility
Act designed to assist persons making the transition from welfare to work.
These include increased subsidies for childcare, stepped-up child support
enforcement, and the ability of states to influence delivery of improved
employment training services.
Finally, HUD reaffirms its commitment to work with PHAs in information-sharing
and in retooling HUD programs to function in the new environment.
-
Letter to PHA Executive Directors from HUD Secretary Henry G. Cisneros
(Oct. 22, 1996).
-
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105 (Aug. 22, 1996) (hereafter Personal
Responsibility Act).
-
he President is proposing a Welfare-to-Work Jobs Challenge that will provide
$3.4 billion to stimulate employment opportunities in the private and nonprofit
sectors for one million "hardest-to-employ welfare recipients." The proposal
includes a welfare-to-work tax credit for employers on 50 percent of the
first $10,000 in wages for long-term welfare recipients.
-
The current programs are Family Self Sufficiency, the Economic Development
and Supportive Services Grant Program, Campus of Learners, Neighborhood
Networks, Youthbuild, the Tenant Opportunity Program, Section 3, Step-Up,
Empowerment Zones/Enterprise Communities, Economic Development Initiative,
Community Develop-ment Block Grant, the Moving-to-Work Demonstration, Jobs
Plus and Bridges to Work. A thumbnail description of these programs is
included in an attachment to the October 22, 1996, HUD letter, entitled
"HUD’s Employment and Training Programs.
Back to this issue's Table of Contents.
Back to the Article List.
Back to the NHLP Home Page.
Main Office:
National Housing Law Project
614 Grand Ave., Ste. 320
Oakland, CA 94610
510-251-9400
510-451-2300
nhlp@nhlp.org |
Washington, DC Office:
1629 K. Street, NW, Suite
600
Washington, DC 20006
202-463-9461
Fax 202-463-9462 |
|
|